My initial reaction to this t.co/rDm70550sA was not strong enough. It's a lot worse. In humans, Global Workspace Theory at least describes a bottleneck through which many kinds of processing —perceptual, motor, memory— reach some sort of conscious access (really just
retweets 25
likes 116
quoted by 1 archive account
substance 5 · argument · rank 219 · Applying Global Workspace Theory to AI consciousness overlooks key human neurological bottleneck contexts.
view on X ↗
Much commotion about this new Anthropic paper, and it's legitimately interesting work. But they are playing coy with quasi-philosophical claims that are not justified by the results. By framing the results in the language of "access consciousness," Anthropic is, deliberately or
New Anthropic research: A global workspace in language models. Of everything happening in your brain right now, only a tiny fraction is consciously accessible—thoughts you can describe, hold in mind, and reason with. We found a strikingly similar divide inside Claude.
retweets 20
likes 89
substance 5 · argument · rank 163 · Anthropic unjustifiably invokes access consciousness to describe language model results.
view on X ↗
1 top reply
indeed, Global Workspace Theory doesn't say anything about phenomenal consciousness