Yup. What they are doing is playing a game where you take [concept from consciousness research] and then [find an analog of it in LLMs], because for *most* theories of consciousness the concepts are defined loosely enough you can always make this work.
retweets 12
likes 124
quoted by 1 archive account
substance 6 · argument · rank 214 · Attributions of consciousness to LLMs exploit loosely defined concepts in consciousness research.
view on X ↗
If you think alignment is hard for pre-trained models, wait until you meet continual learning models
1 more tweet in this thread
Some predictions: 1. Real continual learning will be quite hard. 2. It's probably linked to consciousness and free will (or whatever deflationary definition you want to put in here) and any model that continually learns will feel far more "alive." 3. There is no mathematical way
8 Predictions for the Era of Continual Learning. Also up on YouTube, pod feed, and Substack.
retweets 0
likes 299
substance 5 · opinion · rank 75 · Real continual learning is likely linked to consciousness, making models feel far more alive.
view on X ↗
1 top reply
Given my 9 year olds efforts around getting various school fads (toys, trinkets, games, styles), scheming is going to be a massive issue.