Account · 2 tweets

Gregory M. Kurtzer

@gmkurtzer ↗

Tweets

Gregory M. Kurtzer @gmkurtzer
Skeptical

I get the academic side of this discussion is interesting, but I hope people aren’t taking this seriously. An LLM is not conscious, alive, or even aware. It is a data model using token statistics to decide what comes next based on what data was used to “train” the model.

Shamil Chandaria @shamilch

1/13 Can we assess AI consciousness without first solving consciousness itself? New from Google DeepMind and collaborators across CS, neuroscience & philosophy: “From cacophony to hierarchy: a principled framework for assessing AI consciousness” arxiv.org/abs/2609.35618 🧵

retweets 128 likes 815 quoted by 1 archive account substance 4 · argument · rank 243 · LLMs are not conscious or aware, but statistical models predicting the next token. view on X ↗
1 top reply
Jai @Laneless_

"data model using token statistics to decide what comes next" is not true for any reasonably intuitive definition of "statistics". We have abundant evidence of deep semantic representations and structure that could only be called "statistical" in the most meaninglessly broad

Gregory M. Kurtzer @gmkurtzer
Skeptical

This was a remarkably contentious thread, particularly among people who don't understand what an LLM actually is. So let me follow up with two points about consciousness, memory, and individuality in AI. First: where exactly does consciousness enter the training process? If

1 more tweet in this thread

In reading through the comments, for everyone comparing this to humans and/or babies: no. The process I described is mechanistically nothing like human biological development. We don't understand how subjective conscious experience arises in humans. We don't even have a

retweets 0 likes 514 substance 6 · argument · rank 90 · AI training is mechanistically unlike human biological development and does not produce consciousness. view on X ↗