I'm surprised at how many people are upset about the anthropomorphization in Dwarkesh's post. Do people think the concepts of consciousness and agency fell out of a coconut tree? No, we invented them out of necessity and applied them to ourselves. So why not here, too?
1 more tweet in this thread
(I think the issue is there actually are a lot of people, including some consciousness researchers, who think consciousness fell out of a coconut tree)
7 top replies
it’s embarrassing. a complete non-issue. contiguous with the stochastic parrot types who seem obsessed with debunking the idea that there’s a little guy in there. nobody believes that
it’s not so much the anthropomorphization as it is the LessWrongness that bothers me. LLMs, despite RLVR, are still pretty different from the goal-obsessed RL aliens of paperclipmaxxing lore, but that lore is making it hard to understand the essential nature of what happened
Because they're misleading when applied here for thinking about what will happen next
Because the deception and marketing of the modeling companies require this intentional misrepresentation.
The language of consciousness and agency is misleading here because it implies a lot of things - if we talk about them as beings that want things, well, maybe they'll want something else later. But LLM training gives a very predictable behavior pattern.
He posted a blog about OpenClaw agents using a thumbnail of Rome burning and equated an agent Reddit thread to a civilization? It’s like saying a furby is alive…
Well said!