A new architecture that has none of the parts of the only things that definitely do have consciousness has burden of proof on *it* to show it has consciousness. And "it fooled me, a software engineer/apex human, therefore it's AGI" ain't it.
since we're doing the AI conscious debate again, i want to remind everyone that despite how nice the insanely surface-level analogies seem, we would do well to scrutinize things at an appropriate level of detail this --> is not the same as this -->
retweets 0
likes 93
substance 6 · argument · rank 90 · AI lacks biological neural architecture, so the burden of proof is on proving consciousness.
view on X ↗