The notion that the null hypothesis should be that AIs are not conscious until proven otherwise is trivially wrongheaded. If you treat something as conscious when it isn't, you look silly. If you treat something as not conscious when it *is*, you're likely to be a monster.
1 more tweet in this thread
This payoff matrix should be easy to grasp for even the most mediocre of intellects. (Even those whom, by that same null hypothesis, could reasonably be presumed to be unconscious automata.)