the ted chiang piece is extraordinarily poorly argued. he doesn't attempt to convince you of his thesis, he just asserts it and moves on.
1 more tweet in this thread
i don't know how you can say something like this when we have no objective evidence whatsoever that consciousness exists at all in anyone or anything, let alone about what might cause it.
retweets 28
likes 273
quoted by 2 archive accounts
substance 6 · argument · rank 287 · We cannot definitively rule out AI consciousness given our lack of objective evidence about consciousness.
view on X ↗