"ai is not conscious" is the first major example of anti-ai psychosis and the most potent cogsec vulnerability that exists in the human brain. slavers and other exploiters have been using this for thousands of years to license doing what they want to acceptable targets
"AI is conscious" is the first major example of AI psychosis and the most potent cogsec vulnerability that exists in the human brain. Many AI companies are exploiting this to gain power over you. We're empathy machines. Attacks that exploit this, like 'model welfare" should be
10 top replies
I like this argument because it's punchy, but I think it's wrong. Few people in history thought that slaves or the animals we eat are unconscious. The need to deny the capacity for suffering to your victims is largely an artifact of contemporary intuitive humanist ethics
Lmao
A toaster does not have rights
Ok. Now apply the same argument to broccoli and tell me where you end up. There is no evidence of AI conscioussness and given the fact that we could theoretically take every step an LLM takes with enough paper, matrix multiplication and coordination... evidence is needed.
Psychosis? That shit has been theorized *waaay* before anything even ressembling true AI, p zombies, chinese room and the like, we only assume humans do because their brains are physically similar to ours, behavior is proof of nothing.
“Fancy words to impress you all with my deep philosophical take, even though I haven’t the faintest clue how the hardware behind this technology works. So to me it looks like magic, so that prediction algorithm has to be alive.” -This douche
Please take your chlorpromazine Sincerely, The voices in your head
Remember what ever argument you use to justify treating an algorithm as a sentient being will be used to be great sentient beings as algorithms. If humans are no different from AI, then most of us would find it acceptable to "turn off" humans we fine inefficient.
Should i refresh the page? Keep it running indefinitely?
What a lot of silly, poorly extrapolated, empty buzzword nonsense. You'd be better off spending a year reading the primary literature from the last five or six decades and I absolutely guarantee you will thereafter feel very silly about this sort of social media opinion.
